Whilst on the surface this might sound like a knotty question, in reality, it’s not.
If you want to understand your full legal position when dealing with faulty products, you can use our free Faulty Goods Rights Checker.
The retailer here has admitted the goods are faulty and accepted the responsibility for replacement, so this would fall squarely under the Sale of Goods Act 1979. Whether it fell under the “reasonable” amount of time given by the Act is debatable, since that time isn’t specified by the Act, but in this case the circumstances (the shop’s acceptance of responsibility) actually make it irrelevant.
You’re in luck, though. Since the Sales of Goods Act does apply, with the retailer taking responsibility, then the furniture retailer should pay the delivery charge – not you - for the replacement of your suite – it’s all part of the replacement of faulty goods covered under the Act, which also specifies the replacement should take place in a “reasonable” period of time (the same would apply if the item was being repaired). So it should all work out very well for you - £69 is something you really don’t need to pay again! Although you haven’t said when the company will replace these faulty goods, from their attention it would seem as if the time frame for replacement will be reasonable.
Find out your legal rights on a faulty product in less than a minute.
Try our Faulty Goods Rights Checker free, here on this site →In some ways you’re quite lucky; often, after six months has elapsed, under the Act it’s up to the customer to prove that the goods were faulty. If the retailer had decided to dispute your claim, then the onus would have fallen on you for proof, which could have taken some time to iron out. Had it happened within the first six months, there could have been no doubt about responsibility of faulty goods, so the retailer is being good with its customer relations in this instance.
The Sale of Goods Act provides wonderful protection for consumers against faulty goods, and makes it much easier for consumers as it makes the retailers responsible, at least for that first “reasonable” period of time, rather than the manufacturer. The only instance when the manufacturer becomes liable is if the product causes damage, such as a fire, or personal harm, in which case the whole thing falls under what’s called “product liability.”
Your situation may be slightly different. ask a question below ↓ and our editorial team will reply with our advice.
Ask Consumer Rights Expert a question
Ask our editorial team a question and we will reply with our advice. Tell us as much about your situation as you can: the more detail you give, the more useful our answer can be.
You do not need to use your real name. Please do not include your full address, phone number, email address, or the names of other people. We may edit or remove identifying details for privacy and legal reasons.
Comments are moderated before publication.