Do I Pay a Delivery Charge for Faulty Replacement?

Q.In February 2008 I purchased a leather suite from a well known leather furniture retailer, I was charged £69 for delivery, the suite has developed a fault and they have agreed to replace it, would I have to pay another delivery charge for the replacement?

A.
Whilst on the surface this might sound like a knotty question, in reality, it’s not.
The retailer here has admitted the goods are faulty and accepted the responsibility for replacement, so this would fall squarely under the Sale of Goods Act 1979. Whether it fell under the “reasonable” amount of time given by the Act is debatable, since that time isn’t specified by the Act, but in this case the circumstances (the shop’s acceptance of responsibility) actually make it irrelevant.
You’re in luck, though. Since the Sales of Goods Act does apply, with the retailer taking responsibility, then the furniture retailer should pay the delivery charge – not you - for the replacement of your suite – it’s all part of the replacement of faulty goods covered under the Act, which also specifies the replacement should take place in a “reasonable” period of time (the same would apply if the item was being repaired). So it should all work out very well for you - £69 is something you really don’t need to pay again! Although you haven’t said when the company will replace these faulty goods, from their attention it would seem as if the time frame for replacement will be reasonable.
In some ways you’re quite lucky; often, after six months has elapsed, under the Act it’s up to the customer to prove that the goods were faulty. If the retailer had decided to dispute your claim, then the onus would have fallen on you for proof, which could have taken some time to iron out. Had it happened within the first six months, there could have been no doubt about responsibility of faulty goods, so the retailer is being good with its customer relations in this instance.
The Sale of Goods Act provides wonderful protection for consumers against faulty goods, and makes it much easier for consumers as it makes the retailers responsible, at least for that first “reasonable” period of time, rather than the manufacturer. The only instance when the manufacturer becomes liable is if the product causes damage, such as a fire, or personal harm, in which case the whole thing falls under what’s called “product liability.”
Re: Dealing With Cowboy Builders
I see someone else here has had considerable trouble with Michael (Mick / Mike) O'Connor of London North South Builders (AKA…
Re: Dealing With Cowboy Builders
A.L Towsnend Building and Landscaping,Moreton-in-Marsh,Glos.We found out too late that this little scumbag is no stranger to the…
Re: Holiday Lets: Is the Contract With Owner or Agent?
We booked a Hen Party Cottage for one night, The agents will not return our £500 security deposit.…
Re: What Are my Rights on a Faulty Television?
Purchased My 58inch hitachi tv on 13/11/20 around 18 months ago screen the screen has frozen and now gone black…
Re: When Your Hair Do Goes Wrong
Just had my full head coloured purple but the purple hasn't taken properly the peroxide blonde is showing all over in different…
Re: Buying a New Car: Your Rights
If you return one of two items to a supplier with their nominated and arranged courier and it is completely broken in transit and…
Re: A Guide to the Consumer Rights Act 2015
I placed an order for 3 and 2 seater sofa back in October 2021. I was told in writing that delivery is up to 18…
Re: When Your Hair Do Goes Wrong
Hi Kim, did your friend have a hair mesh/interlace system?
Re: When the Car You've Just Bought Breaks Down
My wife bought a brand new MG HS model we picked it up from the showroom on Friday the 18/3/22 we drove home…
Re: Dealing With Cowboy Builders
Brian Gummer of Green Space Timber Ltd •Perverted comments "how have you not got a bf". "I can't believe you're single". "Do…